Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
MiniMax-M3.1-FlashMiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	56/100	100/100	70/100	81/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	68/100	81/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark

Overview

Author

Context length

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image

Text, Image, Video

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Pricing

Input

$0.10/ 1M

$0.15/ 1M

Output

$0.60/ 1M

Cached input

$0.0042/ 1M

$0.01/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

85K

958K

Completed sessions

1,096,168

125,702,968

Token share

0.25%

14.4%

Tokens

3.2T+100%

189T+100%

SEP 11NOV 5

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

72.3%14K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.