Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs pulse-alpha

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017DeepSeekHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
pulse-alphaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017	56/100	100/100	58/100	81/100	33/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
pulse-alpha	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder	50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder

Overview

Author

Context length

Unknown

Reasoning

True

Unknown

Input modalities

Text, Image

Unknown

Output modalities

Text

Unknown

Providers

Pricing

Input

$0.16/ 1M

Unknown

Output

$1.20/ 1M

Unknown

Cached input

$0.006/ 1M

Unknown

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

85K

11K

Completed sessions

1,096,168

120,898

Token share

0.25%

0.07%

Tokens

3.2T+100%

865B+100%

SEP 11NOV 5

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.