Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniMax-M2.7
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- MiniMax-M2.7MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 76/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| MiniMax-M2.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 76/100 | 62/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.21/ 1M
Output
$0.40/ 1M
$0.84/ 1M
Cached input
$0.004/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
5.2M
32K
Completed sessions
141,845,462
122,287
Token share
47.6%
0.01%
Tokens
626T+20,606%
96B-69%
SEP 11NOV 5
SEP 11NOV 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
72.8%522K user-weeks
57%1.4K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M2.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonMiniMax-M2.7 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.7·Jamba Mini