Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Hy4
- DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek
- Hy4TencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 26/100 | 73/100 | 76/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 0/100 |
| Hy4 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 52/100 | 92/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.14/ 1M
$0.46/ 1M
Output
$0.28/ 1M
$1.39/ 1M
Cached input
$0.0028/ 1M
$0.02/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.2M
1.7K
Completed sessions
17,999,818
6,240
Token share
4.15%
0%
Tokens
55T-81%
11B+100%
SEP 11NOV 5
SEP 11NOV 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.3%88K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeHy4 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy4·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonHy4 vs Jamba MiniHy4·Jamba Mini