Compare AI models: MiniMax-M2.7 vs GLM-5.3-Flash

MiniMax-M2.7MiniMaxHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
GLM-5.3-FlashZhipu

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
MiniMax-M2.7	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	76/100	62/100	50/100	0/100	0/100
GLM-5.3-Flash	56/100	35/100	73/100	81/100	67/100	0/100

Overview

Author

MiniMax

Zhipu

Context length

205K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text

Text, Image, Video, Pdf

Output modalities

Text

Providers

MiniMax

Zhipu

Pricing

Input

$0.21/ 1M

$0.12/ 1M

Output

$0.84/ 1M

$0.42/ 1M

Cached input

$0.04/ 1M

$0.03/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

32K

1.1M

Completed sessions

122,287

19,070,007

Token share

0.01%

2.84%

Tokens

96B-69%

37T-29%

SEP 11NOV 5

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

57%1.4K user-weeks

62.1%73K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeMiniMax-M2.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructMiniMax-M2.7Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeGLM-5.3-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.3-FlashDracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonMiniMax-M2.7 vs Jamba MiniMiniMax-M2.7Jamba Mini Related comparisonGLM-5.3-Flash vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.3-FlashJamba Mini