Compare AI models: Kimi K3 vs Grok 4.7
- Kimi K3MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kimi K3 | 100/100 | 100/100 | 10/100 | 92/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Grok 4.7 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 71/100 | 24/100 | 74/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
500K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text, Image, Pdf
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$3.00/ 1M
$2.00/ 1M
Output
$15/ 1M
$6.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
213K
72K
Completed sessions
689,110
179,278
Token share
0.04%
0.01%
Tokens
485B-74%
89B+100%
SEP 11NOV 5
SEP 11NOV 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
41%15K user-weeks
44.4%1.9K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeKimi K3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K3·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonKimi K3 vs Jamba MiniKimi K3·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7·Jamba Mini