Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Max vs Hy4
- Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba
- Hy4TencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Max | 88/100 | 100/100 | 24/100 | 81/100 | 67/100 | 91/100 |
| Hy4 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 40/100 | 92/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video, Pdf
Text, Image
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$2.00/ 1M
$0.83/ 1M
Output
$6.00/ 1M
$2.50/ 1M
Cached input
$0.25/ 1M
$0.04/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
117K
1.7K
Completed sessions
542,306
6,240
Token share
0.02%
0%
Tokens
239B-17%
11B+100%
SEP 11NOV 5
SEP 11NOV 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
42.6%4.7K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Max·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeHy4 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy4·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Max·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonHy4 vs Jamba MiniHy4·Jamba Mini