Compare AI models: Hy4 vs jev-1.13
- Hy4TencentHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- jev-1.13Hollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hy4 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 40/100 | 92/100 | 33/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| jev-1.13 | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
Unknown
Reasoning
True
Unknown
Input modalities
Text, Image
Unknown
Output modalities
Text
Unknown
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.83/ 1M
Unknown
Output
$2.50/ 1M
Unknown
Cached input
$0.04/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
1.7K
42K
Completed sessions
6,240
3,883,001
Token share
0%
0.01%
Tokens
11B+100%
73B+100%
SEP 11NOV 5
SEP 11NOV 5
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeHy4 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy4·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativejev-1.13 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instructjev-1.13·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonHy4 vs Jamba MiniHy4·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonjev-1.13 vs Jamba Minijev-1.13·Jamba Mini